Hungary Bans Officer, Sets Conditions for Ukraine’s EU Path
Hungary has escalated tensions with Ukraine by banning a Ukrainian military officer from the Schengen Area while simultaneously offering a conditional path to unblock Kyiv’s European Union accession talks. The complex diplomatic maneuvering places new hurdles on Ukraine’s ambition to join the bloc, tying it directly to issues of energy security and minority rights.
The immediate flashpoint is Budapest’s decision to sanction Roberto Brovdi, a Ukrainian army commander of Hungarian descent known by the call sign “Madyar.” Hungarian Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó announced the Schengen-wide travel ban, accusing Brovdi’s unit of conducting attacks on the Druzhba pipeline, a critical artery delivering Russian oil to Hungary and Slovakia. Szijjártó branded the strikes an “attack on Hungary’s sovereignty” that jeopardized its energy security.
The move drew a sharp rebuke from Kyiv. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy expressed outrage that an EU member would sanction a Ukrainian citizen and ethnic Hungarian who is defending his country. He instructed his foreign ministry to investigate all the facts and prepare an appropriate response to what is perceived as a hostile act.
Contradicting this hardline stance, signals of a potential compromise emerged from Budapest. Deputy Foreign Minister Levente Magyar suggested Hungary could lift its long-standing veto on the opening of EU accession negotiations with Ukraine. However, this diplomatic carrot comes with a significant condition: Kyiv must take “real steps” to guarantee the rights of the ethnic Hungarian minority in the Zakarpattia region. Magyar cautioned against more “empty promises,” stating Hungary had heard enough to “dam rivers larger than the Danube.”
Yet, any hope for a swift resolution was tempered by Szijjártó, who reiterated his government’s firm opposition to any fast-track EU membership for Ukraine. He described such a scenario as a “tragedy” for both Hungary and the entire EU, warning it would drain the bloc’s funds, allow “Ukrainian mafia to roam freely in Europe,” and devastate the continent’s agricultural sector with low-quality imports.
Analysts view this dual approach as a calculated strategy by Prime Minister Viktor Orbán’s government to leverage its EU position to extract concessions from Kyiv. While Budapest has a history of threatening to use its veto, particularly regarding sanctions on Russia, it has often eventually aligned with the EU consensus. The situation is further complicated by reports that former U.S. President Donald Trump may have privately urged Orbán to soften his opposition to Ukraine’s EU integration.
The European Commission has also entered the fray, stating that the Druzhba pipeline is integral to European energy security and should not be targeted. A spokesperson confirmed that the EC had raised the issue with Ukrainian authorities following formal complaints from Hungary and Slovakia about the supply disruptions, highlighting the broader European dimension of the conflict.